Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!ucsd!ucbvax!lta.com!david
From: david@lta.com (David B. Lewis)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.motif
Subject: HCI tests and Open Look
Message-ID: <9104022240.AA07214@lta.com>
Date: 2 Apr 91 22:40:37 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: inet
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 8

> ... just isn't as well thought out as Open Look.  

I swore that I wouldn't get involved in this near-pointless Unix Today stuff,
but this comment has come up before, and I feel that this holier-than-thou
attitude is inappropriate, given the lack of documentation for the reaons 
behind Open Look design decisions.  So far as I can judge from the fact that
there exist no user studies, "well thought out" means only "took a long time 
from specification to toolkit".