Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!milton!whit From: whit@milton.u.washington.edu (John Whitmore) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: X-Y detection of moving metal ball? Message-ID: <1991Mar31.063417.28735@milton.u.washington.edu> Date: 31 Mar 91 06:34:17 GMT References: <1225@telesoft.com> Organization: University of Washington, Seattle Lines: 30 In article <1225@telesoft.com> rlk@telesoft.com (Bob Kitzberger @sation) writes: >Problem: I want to detect the X and Y coordinates of a metal ball bearing >(magnetized or not) in motion within a box. The data collection must >occur in a fashion that allows me to derive the velocity vector of the ball >bearing in the X-Y plane. The size of the box is approximately one foot by one >foot. Also, I should mention that the detection must occur in real-time. This is similar to the magnetic-suspension problem (solved by Jesse W. Beams, in the era of vacuum tubes) for an ultracentrifuge. The rotor is held up by a magnet, and it is necessary to sense the distance to the rotor so the magnetic field can be adjusted (by a feedback loop). Though I don't know how relevant the solution is to your situation, it was done by measuring the capacitance change of a pair of plates near the rotor; a conductor inserted into a capacitor raises the capacity (and lowers the frequency of the attached oscillator). The position detector was an FM detector. To make a 2-dimensional version, you will need to make at least two oscillators (at very different frequencies, so the one doesn't affect the other), attaching one to the N and W sides of your box, the other to the S and E sides. Calibrating the thing will be a task. If you know someone with good skills at conformal mapping, you can probably find some electrode shapes/placements that simplify the problem. Parenthetically, I didn't like the Hall sensor approach; the Hall sensors are polarity-dependent, and a rolling ball will swap poles a LOT. Descrambling the resulting info will not be easy. John Whitmore