Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!sun!amdcad!amdcad!military
From: rwsayer@phoenix.princeton.edu (Ronald W Sayer)
Newsgroups: sci.military
Subject: Anti-tank weapons
Message-ID: <1991Apr3.024547.23872@amd.com>
Date: 2 Apr 91 14:48:27 GMT
References: <1991Apr1.042920.17593@amd.com> <1991Apr2.065336.15687@amd.com>
Sender: military@amd.com
Organization: Princeton University
Lines: 13
Approved: military@amd.com



From: rwsayer@phoenix.princeton.edu (Ronald W Sayer)

	Are most hand-held or tripod-mounted anti-tank weapons
of the HEAT or of the kinetic variety (such as the TOW 2 and
HOT)? 
	Do the US, USSR, and Iraq tend to buy/use one kind over
the other?  I wonder if the spread of reactive armor will change
the types of anti-tank weapons in the future. 

Ron Sayer
rwsayer@phoenix.princeton.edu