Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!ukc!mucs!liv-cs!liv!qq11
From: QQ11@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK (Alan Thew)
Newsgroups: comp.editors
Subject: Re: Xedit is better than vi and emacs
Message-ID: <91096.084712QQ11@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK>
Date: 6 Apr 91 07:47:12 GMT
Article-I.D.: LIVERPOO.91096.084712QQ11
References: <2197@pdxgate.UUCP> <3817@uc.msc.umn.edu> <1991Apr4.172610.27932@mtu.edu> <3825@uc.msc.umn.edu>
Organization: University of Liverpool
Lines: 10

At the risk of prolonging a fairly stupid discussion, I use vi (and
jove & uE occasionally...I know vi better...been at it longer) with
Un*x and XEDIT with CMS. Both are good for the job in their
respective environments.

Can we give this "my editor is better than your editor" thing a break
please or create an alt.editor.flame group and let comp.editors be
useful?

Thanks.