Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!eru!sow From: sow@cad.luth.se (Sven-Ove Westberg) Newsgroups: comp.graphics.visualization Subject: Re: Out of the lab, into the classroom 2nd try Message-ID: <1779@eru.mt.luth.se> Date: 4 Apr 91 08:47:29 GMT References: <1991Apr2.202227.13796@agate.berkeley.edu> Organization: University of Lulea, Sweden Lines: 33 In article <1991Apr2.202227.13796@agate.berkeley.edu> andyr@sag4.ssl.berkeley.edu (Andy Rose) writes: |(I posted this once, but didn't see it so here it is again.) | | |What coursework is appropriate for this subject? | |Is anyone teaching or planning to teach a class in visualization? What |text to use? What is the course called? You should give ALL students a basic course i computer graphics so they understand some of the bacic graphics. But I dont think it is good to give a course in visualization. The visualization stuff must be integrated in the other courses where they belong as a tool. Visualization is a tool like the calculator on your desk. I dont think it is possible to give a course in visualization without some "real" applications where the students understand the application. This discussion of visualization specialists is the same as we has in the mechanical engineering. Should the designers do some finite element analysis or should they ship it to the FEA specialist. Now we got a new group the visualization specialist he gots the results from the FEA guy. Guess how productive this is? No we have to see a lot of this stuff as just tools. That should be easy to use. It is not impressing that a lot of labs is doing research in the visualization area. Isn't it a special NSF program in visualization? How was is BEFORE this program? Research organisations have to do work where they can get some foundings. Dont misunderstand this a lot of labs is doing a good impressing work. Sven-Ove Westberg, CAD, University of Lulea, S-951 87 Lulea, Sweden. Internet: sow@cad.luth.se