Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!pitt!willett!ForthNet
From: ForthNet@willett.pgh.pa.us (ForthNet articles from GEnie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: PYGMY Forth
Message-ID: <2584.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 6 Apr 91 02:24:53 GMT
Organization: (n.) to be organized.  But that's not important right now.
Lines: 18

Category 1,  Topic 45
Message 79        Thu Apr 04, 1991
F.SERGEANT [Frank]           at 01:01 CST
 
 LGL> Why did you put the disk buffers under the parameter stack?  This 
 LGL> will limit the size of the stack and the degree of recursion.
 .
 Greg, you've got a good point.  The reason I did it that way is I more  often
change the number of disk buffers than the size of the stacks.   However,
there is no reason for you not to put the stacks below the  disk buffers and
TIB.
 . 
 -- Frank
-----
This message came from GEnie via willett.  You *cannot* reply to the author
using e-mail.  Please post a follow-up article, or use any instructions
the author may have included (USMail addresses, telephone #, etc.).
Report problems to: dwp@willett.pgh.pa.us _or_ uunet!willett!dwp