Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!pitt!willett!ForthNet
From: ForthNet@willett.pgh.pa.us (ForthNet articles from GEnie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: What's WRONG with Forth?
Message-ID: <2585.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 6 Apr 91 02:24:55 GMT
Organization: (n.) to be organized.  But that's not important right now.
Lines: 21


 Date: 04-01-91 (17:07)              Number: 1716 of 1724
   To: GARY SMITH                    Refer#: 1632
 From: ANIL RODRIX                     Read: NO
 Subj: WHAT'S WRONG WITH FORTH?      Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE
 Conf: FORTH (58)                 Read Type: GENERAL (+)

 re : 1 2 ;
 In several Forth's when this definition is accepted it is a tad short of
 'merrily ' ; they give you a message saying ALREADY DEFINED or NOT
 UNIQUE or some such, which is enough warning for me.
 One should know enuf to use a redefined 1 if one does it.

 PCRelay:PROPC -> #288 RelayNet (tm)
 4.10             Pittsburgh ProPC BBS (412) 321-6645
 <<<>>>
-----
This message came from GEnie via willett.  You *cannot* reply to the author
using e-mail.  Please post a follow-up article, or use any instructions
the author may have included (USMail addresses, telephone #, etc.).
Report problems to: dwp@willett.pgh.pa.us _or_ uunet!willett!dwp