Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!pitt!willett!ForthNet
From: ForthNet@willett.pgh.pa.us (ForthNet articles from GEnie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Multi-tasking and Multi-user
Message-ID: <2587.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 6 Apr 91 02:24:59 GMT
Organization: (n.) to be organized.  But that's not important right now.
Lines: 30


 Date: 04-02-91 (08:30)              Number: 1724 of 1724 (Echo)
   To: GARY SMITH                    Refer#: 1701
 From: JACK WOEHR                      Read: NO
 Subj: MULTI-TASKING AND MULTI-U     Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE
 Conf: FORTH (58)                 Read Type: GENERAL (+)

 -> From: kube@cs.UAlberta.CA (Ron Kube) Subject: Multi-tasking in FORTH
 -> Summary: Question about multi-tasking in FORTH Keywords: multi
 -> tasking Message-ID: <kube.670357191@menaik> Date: 30 Mar 91 18:19:51
 -> GMT Sender: news@cs.UAlberta.CA (News Administrator) Distribution:
 -> comp.lang.forth Organization: University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
 ->
 -> MY QUESTION:  Are there other SBCs(ie New Micros Inc)that are
 -> multi-tasking? -----------   Is the word TASK part of fig-FORTH
 -> standards (I suspect not)?

  Many, if not most control-oriented Forth systems are multitasking,
 as is our Vesta Forth-83+, Forth-83A+ and Forth-83i96 on our range
 of single board computers (80x88,68000,80196).

                 =jax=

 NET/Mail : RCFB Golden, CO (303) 278-0364 VESTA & Denver FIG for Forth!
 <<<>>>
-----
This message came from GEnie via willett.  You *cannot* reply to the author
using e-mail.  Please post a follow-up article, or use any instructions
the author may have included (USMail addresses, telephone #, etc.).
Report problems to: dwp@willett.pgh.pa.us _or_ uunet!willett!dwp