Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!noao!coyote!jmh From: jmh@coyote.datalog.com (John Hughes) Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2 Subject: Re: Draft Standard Message-ID: <1991Apr7.070449.26733@coyote.datalog.com> Date: 7 Apr 91 07:04:49 GMT References: <812.27FC4CE9@puddle.fidonet.org> Organization: Datalog Consulting, Tucson, AZ Lines: 24 In article <812.27FC4CE9@puddle.fidonet.org> Pat.Terry@p101.f4.n494.z5.fidonet.org (Pat Terry) writes: >In a message of , Rw Hutchinson (1:151/503.4) writes: > > >Has anyone any idea when the ISO standard for Modula-2 might become final? > >RSN (grin) > > >built-in data type. I recall that complex numbers ARE included in the > >draft standard, but that as of now few or no compilers support them. > >They probably aren't in any current implementations, because they were never in >M-2. The next draft proposal will include them, effectively FORTRAN like. > Anyone know what the current rev. level on the draft is? My copy says something to the effect of 'D106/N336 29 October 1989'. Is there a newer revision running about? -- | John M. Hughes | "...unfolding in consciousness at the | | datalog.com!moondog!jmh | deliberate speed of pondering." - Daniel Dennet | | jmh%coyote@noao.edu |--------------------------------------------------| | jmh%moondog@datalog.com | P.O.Box 43305, Tucson, AZ 85733 602-624-8008 |