Xref: utzoo alt.bbs.waffle:1469 comp.mail.uucp:6349 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!olivea!isc-br!tau-ceti!dogear!root From: root@dogear.UUCP (Bob Kirkpatrick) Newsgroups: alt.bbs.waffle,comp.mail.uucp Subject: no dance tonight... Keywords: RLOGIN, uucp, Waffle Message-ID: <320@dogear.UUCP> Date: 8 Apr 91 18:50:45 GMT Organization: Brand-X Systems of Spokane, WA. USA 99202 Lines: 50 I'm having (have been for a while here) a problem getting a handshake between a pc running waffle 1.64, and a unix host. (actually, either one of two unix hosts) Entries on the pc side: \waffle\system\systems : entries triple checked, and compared with the systems files of other successful waffle installs. \waffle\system\static : entries triple checked, and compared with the static files of other successful waffle installs. /usr/lib/uucp/L.sys ; entries the same as other functional uucp nodes. /usr/lib/uucp/USERFILE : entries the same as other functional uucp nodes. each of the two unix hosts have been communicating by uucp for a *long* time with no problems whatsoever. I've checked every way I can think of. The systems, pc and unix host, connect. uucp logs into the host, passing the login: and password: prompts easily. The systems identify to each other, the host giving the Shere= and my pc giving the Rxxxxxx response. then: rmsg sync 10 Cannot Tango - reason: RLOGIN and that about does it. Does _anyone_ have any suggestions? This is making me zonkers! I have tried to see if it's a matter of hated nodenames, node name length, small typos in the support files on either system. Because the unix boxes communicate flawlessly, and waffle does exactly the same abort talking to either unix host, I'm pretty sure there is something amiss on the pc side. HELP! please reply: bobk@isc-br!tau-ceti thanks in advance Bob K. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bob Kirkpatrick - Dog Ear'd Systems | A division of Brand-X of Spokane WA | "Einstein was probably one of *them*." -------------------------------------------------------------------------------