Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!deccrl!news.crl.dec.com!shlump.nac.dec.com!tkou02.enet.dec.com!jit345!diamond From: diamond@jit345.swstokyo.dec.com (Norman Diamond) Newsgroups: comp.object Subject: Re: Documenting OO Systems Message-ID: <1991Apr8.084815.4944@tkou02.enet.dec.com> Date: 8 Apr 91 08:48:15 GMT References: <20106@alice.att.com> <1991Mar26.191259.14470@i88.isc.com> < > <27F4D4BE.716@tct.uucp> < > <1991Apr2.175756.12586@visix.com> <1574@acf5.NYU.EDU> <1576@acf5.N Sender: usenet@tkou02.enet.dec.com (USENET News System) Reply-To: diamond@jit345.enet@tkou02.enet.dec.com (Norman Diamond) Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation Japan , Tokyo Lines: 12 In article <1576@acf5.NYU.EDU> sabbagh@acf5.NYU.EDU (sabbagh) writes: >Finally, I want to point out that the invention of C++, Eiffel and a >number of other languages have pointed out the true value >of C: as a replacement to assembly language! Uh, yeah, in fact, the original purpose of C has been rediscovered every month for the last 21 years. Or longer, if we recall that C's predecessors were also intended as replacements to assembly language. -- Norman Diamond diamond@tkov50.enet.dec.com If this were the company's opinion, I wouldn't be allowed to post it.