Xref: utzoo alt.privacy:213 comp.org.eff.talk:1945 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!apple!netcom!aahz From: aahz@netcom.COM (Aahzmandius) Newsgroups: alt.privacy,comp.org.eff.talk Subject: Re: Telephone Caller ID's Message-ID: <1991Apr5.070504.8137@netcom.COM> Date: 5 Apr 91 07:05:04 GMT References: <1991Mar29.201740.24251@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> <1991Apr03.002723.19571@ddsw1.MCS.COM> Organization: Vorpal Bunnies, Inc. Lines: 17 In article karl@ficc.ferranti.com (Karl Lehenbauer) writes: >Really you want a logical ID rather than a physical one. [omitted] >Trouble with this would be all the different four-digit >numbers your various buddies would be assigning to you -- best to have a >more universal ID. Hmmmm....isn't this right back where we started, where we were worrying about the effects of universal ID? -- --- Aahz (aka Dan Bernstein) New Address!! @netcom.com (or netcom!aahz@apple.com) I am not a race-car driver, but I play one on 17.