Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!sun!amdcad!brahms!phil
From: phil@brahms.amd.com (Phil Ngai)
Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: Re: EFF Chapters
Keywords: EFF college academia chapters
Message-ID: <1991Apr5.204044.294@amd.com>
Date: 5 Apr 91 20:40:44 GMT
References: <1991Mar19.213148.14254@vpnet.chi.il.us> <669491914.4141@mindcraft.com> <7846@hsv3.UUCP> <1991Mar26.164325.2631@spool.cs.wisc.edu> <1991Apr1.061003.18924@isis.cs.du.edu> <670552208.6477@mindcraft.com>
Sender: usenet@amd.com (NNTP Posting)
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Lines: 11

karish@mindcraft.com (Chuck Karish) writes:
>It takes some pretty tricky moral gymnastics to deny to oneself
>that a fully functional `defensive' system would also be a potent
>tool in an offensive setting.  I see no clear-cut moral distinction
>between the two concepts.

It takes a real pacifist to think that such reasoning has any relevancy
to national policy.

--
	The best way to preserve your RKBA is to vote Libertarian.