Newsgroups: comp.os.minix Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ira.uka.de!smurf!flatlin!ptavv!ralf From: ralf@ptavv.ka.sub.org (Ralf Wenk) Subject: Re: What's wrong with kermit? (ST minix 1.5) Message-ID: <1991Apr4.153455.00794@ptavv.ka.sub.org> Date: Thu, 4 Apr 1991 15:34:55 GMT Organization: The known space References: <9104021411@arrakis.nl.mugnet.org> Lines: 15 In article <9104021411@arrakis.nl.mugnet.org> bert@arrakis.nl.mugnet.org (Bert Laverman) writes: > ... [Stuff deleted] ... > For this reason, Minix-68k has a second term(1) (on the st called st_term), > which - instead of just forking - executes read_tty(1) and write_tty(1). > These will be new - separate - images, and therefore need no swapping. I have changed the 1.5.10 term(1) and talk(1) to do it the same way on MINIX ST. No special compile option is needed because the changes are triggered only if CHIP is defined as M68000 in . If there is enough interest I am willing to post both. -- -- Ralf Wenk -- ralf@ptavv.ka.sub.org