Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!ukc!strath-cs!glasgow!bru-cc!eesrajm
From: eesrajm@cc.brunel.ac.uk (Andrew J Michael)
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Subject: Re: What's wrong with kermit? (ST minix 1.5)
Summary: What's wrong with the compiler
Message-ID: <2063@Terra.cc.brunel.ac.uk>
Date: 7 Apr 91 16:20:05 GMT
References: <2982@krafla.rhi.hi.is> <9104021411@arrakis.nl.mugnet.org>
Organization: Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK
Lines: 28

In article <9104021411@arrakis.nl.mugnet.org>, bert@arrakis.nl.mugnet.org (Bert Laverman) writes:
> In article <2982@krafla.rhi.hi.is>, adamd@rhi.hi.is (Adam David) wrote:

(Discussion about kermit deleted)

> the usefullness. :-( His most recent attempt (throw out the programming
> language, but keep the interactive part) resulted in a text segment of
> ca. 100Kb (c68 compiled). This sounds hopeful for iNTEL folks. Minix ST
> Is quite capable of handling a bigger kermit, but the compiler ain't. :-(
> 
> 
> Greetings, Bert
> 


I don't understand this.  Why isn't the ST compiler capable of handling big
programs ?   Mine seems to ....


Andy Michael


-- 
Andy Michael                                     "You might think that.  I
85 Hawthorne Crescent                             couldn't possibly comment."
West Drayton					    - `House of Cards'
Middlesex            email: eesrajm@brunel.ac.uk                             
UB7 9PA           or Andrew.Michael@brunel.ac.uk