Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!utkcs2!nall From: nall@cs.utk.edu (John Nall) Newsgroups: comp.os.minix Subject: Re: Stupid questions about Minix-386 ... Message-ID: <1991Apr9.150106.10508@cs.utk.edu> Date: 9 Apr 91 15:01:06 GMT References: <4192@stl.stc.co.uk> Sender: usenet@cs.utk.edu (USENET News Poster) Distribution: comp Organization: University of Tennessee, Knoxville - CS Department Lines: 17 In article <4192@stl.stc.co.uk> agm@daphne.stl.stc.co.uk (Andrew G. Minter) writes: >In article , mike@prg.ox.ac.uk >(Mike Spivey) writes: >|> 2. Recompiling bcc is... > >You mean you have the source for BCC? I'm using GCC at the moment and >it's great, but it's also huge and slow. BCC is very nearly all I need, >but not quite. Given the sources I'd like to work on it a bit! > >Is there any way I can obtain a copy? Bruce? > That did not mean what you THOUGHT it meant :-). You also have a copy of cc.c don't you? It is only a little traffic cop - not the compiler itself. And no, Bruce has not released the compiler, so far as I am aware. John Nall