Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ukma!dftsrv!mimsy!nocusuhs!nmrdc1!minixug!uwalt!waltje
From: waltje@uwalt.nl.mugnet.org (Fred 'The Rebel' van Kempen)
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Subject: Re: Various & Sundry questions....FLAMMABLE!
Message-ID: <9104053529@uwalt.nl.mugnet.org>
Date: 5 Apr 91 11:45:17 GMT
References: <9523@star.cs.vu.nl>
Organization: MicroWalt Corporation, for MINIX Software Development
Lines: 17

ast@cs.vu.nl (Andy Tanenbaum) wrote:
> In article <49498@nigel.ee.udel.edu> KENC@vaxb.acs.unt.edu (Ken Corey, CSCI Major...) writes:
> 
>>>The main difference between minix and current unix systems is that
>>>minix was intended to be coherent ...
> 
> 
> I don't think the Mark Williams Company would approve of that.  In any event,
> I didn't say it.

Hmmm... my MWC disks spell "Coherent 3.0.0".  See the difference here? 
They capitalized the product to make sure... :-)

Fred.
--
MicroWalt Corporation, for MINIX Development	waltje@uwalt.nl.mugnet.org
Tel (+31) 252 230 205, Hoefbladhof  27, 2215 DV  VOORHOUT, The Netherlands
	"An Operating System is what the _USERS_ think of it- me"