Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!eng.ufl.edu!irl.ise.ufl.edu!greg
From: greg@irl.ise.ufl.edu (Greg O'Rear)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Anybody use Helix NetRoom?
Message-ID: <1991Apr5.134307.18171@eng.ufl.edu>
Date: 5 Apr 91 13:43:07 GMT
Sender: news@eng.ufl.edu
Reply-To: greg@irl.ise.ufl.edu (Greg O'Rear)
Distribution: na
Organization: Industrial Research Lab - Univ. of Florida
Lines: 15

With all the discussion about QEMM, this seems to be the place to ask:

Does anybody out there have any experience with Helix NetRoom?  A recent
magazine review gave it high marks.  The claim is that NetRoom works like
QEMM with the advantage of being able to load all network stuff up above
640K (like IPX and NETn, and I presume packet drivers as well).  Helix
have some multiple user pricing schemes as well; QEMM is sold one copy at
a time.

I'd like to provide memory management for everyone on my network.  Would
NetRoom be a good idea or a mistake?
--
Greg O'Rear
Industrial and Systems Engineering Department, University of Florida
Address: O'Rear@ise.ufl.edu