Xref: utzoo comp.os.msdos.programmer:4516 comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc:8372
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!munnari.oz.au!brolga!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!zeus!s64421
From: s64421@zeus.usq.EDU.AU (house ron)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: How good is Zortech C(++)?
Message-ID: <s64421.671126504@zeus>
Date: 8 Apr 91 16:01:44 GMT
Lines: 24


I recently posted a query in msdos.programmer about the quality of
Zortech C and C++.  My initial query was sparked when I noticed that in
gnuchess, the Zortech version has had all multi-dimensional and huge
arrays removed.  If that was really necessary, there must be something
seriously wrong with Zortech C, surely?  I have only received a few
responses, with the following results:

1.	Zortech macros are defective; it cannot handle nested macro calls:
	   FRED(FRED(x))

2.      It is loaded with bugs.

I am interested in following this up, and compiling a full opinion
report on Zortech C and C++.  Would anyone with any information about
the completeness, usefulness, and correctness of these products please
contact me, and I shall compile a report and post it to these newsgroups.
As the latest version is, I believe, very different from the earlier one,
please state which version you have tested.
--
Regards,

Ron House.   (s64421@zeus.usq.edu.au)
(By post: Info Tech, U.C.S.Q. Toowoomba. Australia. 4350)