Xref: utzoo comp.protocols.ibm:1754 comp.protocols.tcp-ip:15554
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!wuarchive!rex!uflorida!gatech!emory!dixie.com!nanovx!msa3b!kevin
From: kevin@msa3b.UUCP (Kevin P. Kleinfelter)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.ibm,comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: TCP tunnelled in IBM/SNA (more)
Message-ID: <1590@msa3b.UUCP>
Date: 8 Apr 91 11:34:10 GMT
References: <1991Apr5.160105.26102@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca>
Followup-To: comp.protocols.ibm
Organization: Dun and Bradstreet Software, Inc., Atlanta, GA
Lines: 10

IBM can do this.  We were interested because we have an existing SNA
network, and needed to let two TCP/IP machines communicate over the
existing network.  Trouble is that you have to have a 370 to wrap
the IP packets AND a 370 to unwrap.  We had a 370 on one end of the link,
and would have had to put a 370 on the other end -- too expensive! :-)
-- 
Kevin Kleinfelter @ Dun and Bradstreet Software, Inc (404) 239-2347
...gatech!nanovx!msa3b!kevin
Warning: There seem to be multiple 'msa3b' nodes on Usenet, and it is
nanoVX, not nanovAx.