Xref: utzoo comp.dcom.lans:7706 comp.protocols.tcp-ip:15570 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!news.cs.indiana.edu!msi.umn.edu!noc.MR.NET!jhereg!andrew From: andrew@jhereg.osa.com (Andrew C. Esh) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans,comp.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: Re: 10BaseT installation Message-ID: <1991Apr9.214405.11827@jhereg.osa.com> Date: 9 Apr 91 21:44:05 GMT References: <1991Apr3.121521.5177@hellgate.utah.edu> <1991Apr4.152345.2962@jhereg.osa.com> <1991Apr6.011139.1572@netcom.COM> Organization: Open Systems Architects, Inc., Mpls, MN Lines: 31 In article <1991Apr6.011139.1572@netcom.COM> cmilono@netcom.COM (Carlo Milono) writes: > > > >and their product is standard. Secondly, it is a misnomer to use the RJ45 >name for an 8-pin jack - the correct terminology is the ISO 8877 jack. The ^^^^^^^^ OK, got it... All I knew was RJ45, but in keeping with my good intentions toward solid international standards in technical communication, the above use is noted, and adopted. > >Lastly, you can run your 10BASE-T on household 'quad' wire and get an >appropriate cord (twisted preferably) to splay the four wires into the >10BASE-T standard spacing within the ISO jack. I have several locations >where the only wire available was a six-conductor wire split between two >four-wire jacks - the first being a true RJ11. Works fine. ^^^^ Huh? Now I feel ripped off. I learned "8-pin RJ45" = ISO 8877, but what is the ISO number for RJ11? Why wasn't it used here? I be confuse. >+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ >| Carlo Milono: cmilono@netcom.apple.com or apple!netcom!cmilono | >|"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, | >|that the dunces are all in confederacy against him." - Jonathan Swift | >+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -- Andrew C. Esh andrew@osa.com Open Systems Architects, Inc. Minneapolis, MN 55416-1528 (612) 525-0000 Practicing the OSI Standard