Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!hsdndev!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: ISO 646 alternate representation
Message-ID: <15748@smoke.brl.mil>
Date: 8 Apr 91 00:59:48 GMT
References: <keld.670872140@dkuugin> <15738@smoke.brl.mil> <keld.671027491@dkuugin>
Organization: U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, APG, MD.
Lines: 6

In article <keld.671027491@dkuugin> keld@login.dkuug.dk (Keld J|rn Simonsen) writes:
>ISO 9899:1990 supports ISO DIS 646 IRV, not the invariant part of 646.

I hope you'll explain this, as I thought that ISO 9899:1990 supported
use of that portion of ISO 646 that was common to all national variants.
If that is not "the invariant part", then what is?