Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!cs.umn.edu!ariel.unm.edu!triton.unm.edu!nwickham From: nwickham@triton.unm.edu (Neal C. Wickham) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: NeXT/Amiga Flamage: Get a life. Message-ID: <1991Apr06.171913.22018@ariel.unm.edu> Date: 6 Apr 91 17:19:13 GMT Article-I.D.: ariel.1991Apr06.171913.22018 References: <#54G+r2i1@cs.psu.edu> <1991Apr06.042636.3533@ariel.unm.edu> <1991Apr6.075425.18800@neon.Stanford.EDU> Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque Lines: 37 In article <1991Apr6.075425.18800@neon.Stanford.EDU> torrie@cs.stanford.edu (Evan Torrie) writes: >nwickham@triton.unm.edu (Neal C. Wickham) writes: > >>I don't think the computer market will change in the next five years >>like it has in the past five. > > Au contraire, I think the PC market is going to change a LOT more in >the next five years than it has in the past five. Consider, since >1986 (5 years ago), not a single significant new architecture has come >to market - the IBM PC already existed, the Mac already existed, the >Amiga and the Atari ST already existed. Sure there have been faster >CPUs and faster buses introduced, but they still have the same old CPU >families and same-design OSes. > In the previous 5 years to that (1981-1986), all of these machines >were introduced anew. > In the next 5 years (91-96), we're going to see new RISC >architectures from ARCA, pen-driven machines from Go et al, RS/6000 >systems coming down into the PC market from IBM, RISC machines and new >OSes from Apple etc... > 86 - 91 was a relatively boring period in the short life of >microcomputers; 91-96 is promising to be much more interesting. I'll >be very surprised if software and hardware aren't radically different >in 96 than they are today. > > > > > >-- >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Evan Torrie. Stanford University, Class of 199? torrie@cs.stanford.edu >"Dear Fascist Bully Boy, Give me some money, or else. Neil. P.S. May >the seed of your loins be fruitful in the womb of your woman..." IBM just dropped OS/2 because of a lack on interest. NCW