Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!menudo.uh.edu!lobster!sugar!peter
From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Subject: Re: Amiga OS *IS* state of the art, but the NeXT is better
Message-ID: <1991Apr9.123959.22560@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Organization: Sugar Land Unix -- Houston, TX
References: <_z8Gw7zh1@cs.psu.edu> <46835@ut-emx.uucp> <?5Gwtik1@cs.psu.edu>
Distribution: usa
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1991 12:39:59 GMT

In article <?5Gwtik1@cs.psu.edu> melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger) writes:
> The basic NeXTstation is great for use on a network.

So the basic NeXTstation isn't so great standalone?

> I know three people.  Think about it.  What other machine are computer
> literate people going to buy?

Well, I'm computer-literate. I bought an Amiga.

It's useful standalone.
-- 
Peter da Silva.   `-_-'
<peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>.