Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!sdd.hp.com!caen!uwm.edu!psuvax1!news
From: melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: NeXT NeXT NeXT NeXT NeXT NeXT NeXT NeXT NeXT NeXT NeXT NeXT
Message-ID: <8.bG_2el1@cs.psu.edu>
Date: 10 Apr 91 00:10:36 GMT
References: <af4G&1qj1@cs.psu.edu> <m23G3+nj1@cs.psu.edu> <10834@uwm.edu>
	<00671144739@elgamy.RAIDERNET.COM>
Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Lines: 17
In-Reply-To: elg@elgamy.RAIDERNET.COM's message of 8 Apr 91 21:05:39 GMT
Nntp-Posting-Host: sunws5.sys.cs.psu.edu


In article <00671144739@elgamy.RAIDERNET.COM> elg@elgamy.RAIDERNET.COM (Eric Lee Green) writes:


   AmigaDOS 2.0 will be released with scalable font technology. No Display
   Postscript, though. (Something similar to Display Postscript that wasn't so
   CPU-hungry might be nice for AmigaDOS 3.0, though, to finally get the
   window system hardware-independent).

I thought that the posts made by a few other people yesterday would
stop the "CPU hungry Display Postscript" postings.

By the way, how long has it taken Commodore to go from 1.3 to 2.0?  I
realize that it isn't out for all their machines, but let's assume
that it will be out this year.

-Mike