Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!dimacs.rutgers.edu!seismo!ukma!rex!samsung!spool.mu.edu!munnari.oz.au!comp.vuw.ac.nz!actrix!templar!jbickers
From: jbickers@templar.actrix.gen.nz (John Bickers)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.games
Subject: Re: Why don't European consider NTSC?
Message-ID: <1940.tnews@templar.actrix.gen.nz>
Date: 4 Apr 91 23:43:02 GMT
References: <164@netw23.uucp>
Organization: TAP, NZAmigaUG.
Lines: 15

Quoted from <164@netw23.uucp> by val@netw23.uucp (Oberon Kenobi):
>      Why is it that the European programmers CAN'T FOLLOW THE RULE?!  Not only

    It's probably "don't", not "can't". From postings in .programmer, it
    appears they make estimations on market penetration over time, and
    decide that NTSC isn't worth it (the same way they decide being HD
    installable isn't worth it).

    It'd be nice if they made it clear the things don't run on particular
    kinds of machines, though. Some must do.

> | "vi?  Because I don't have a real editor." - U*x user. | val@csulx.weber.edu |
--
*** John Bickers, TAP, NZAmigaUG.        jbickers@templar.actrix.gen.nz ***
***         "Patterns multiplying, re-direct our view" - Devo.          ***