Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ccwf.cc.utexas.edu From: greg@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Greg Harp) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.marketplace Subject: Re: Developer vs. Ed pricing Message-ID: <46910@ut-emx.uucp> Date: 9 Apr 91 10:05:22 GMT References: Sender: news@ut-emx.uucp Reply-To: greg@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Greg Harp) Organization: The University of Texas at Austin Lines: 32 In article swansonc@acc.stolaf.edu (Chris Swanson) writes: > >With the changes in the educational pricing scheme at CBM, is it a >better deal to get developer or educational pricing? [Ahem.] ...assuming you're planning on actually doing Amiga development and not just trying to get a discount on hardware... :) Besides, developers aren't allowed to comment on proprietary info, and I consider the price lists to be just that. (Of course, the word "CONFIDENTIAL" at the top of the list helps me come to that conclusion. :) ) IMNSHO, C= should start requiring regular reports from developers on what they are doing. I know they appreciate it when you keep them up to date, but maybe they should start filtering the real developers from the freeloaders. Of course, that would add a lot of paperwork on C='s part, but they don't _have_ to actually read it then, do they? :) [Gee, while I'm thinking about it I had better make a note to send in a summary of my work one of these days... :) ] I will say one thing: The educational prices are superb. If you ever plan on buying equipment from C= do it while you can take advantage of these prices. > -Chris Greg -- Greg Harp |"How I wish, how I wish you were here. We're just two |lost souls swimming in a fishbowl, year after year, greg@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu|running over the same ground. What have we found? s609@cs.utexas.edu |The same old fears. Wish you were here." - Pink Floyd