Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!rutgers!cbmvax!jesup
From: jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com (Randell Jesup)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: Line-thickness drawing attribute
Message-ID: <20468@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Date: 9 Apr 91 01:00:51 GMT
References: <1991Mar27.155056.27758@decuac.dec.com> <24200@wehi.dn.mu.oz> <965@boing.UUCP> <20310@cbmvax.commodore.com> <1991Apr7.174600.24545@wehi.dn.mu.oz>
Reply-To: jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com (Randell Jesup)
Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA
Lines: 19

In article <1991Apr7.174600.24545@wehi.dn.mu.oz> baxter_a@wehi.dn.mu.oz writes:
>My line pattern was half pixels on, then the other half off.
>My line was horizontal.
>The line was made of segments (variable number) using Draw(), no Move()'s.
>One segment, no problems.
>Several segments, looks okay, but the more segments, the worse it looks,
>line becomes moth eaten.
>Segment ending at every pixel, no pattern at all.

	I think Draw normally does start the pattern fresh (how canit know
otherwise?)  Are you sure you're talking Move() and Draw()??

-- 
Randell Jesup, Keeper of AmigaDos, Commodore Engineering.
{uunet|rutgers}!cbmvax!jesup, jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com  BIX: rjesup  
Disclaimer: Nothing I say is anything other than my personal opinion.
Thus spake the Master Ninjei: "To program a million-line operating system
is easy, to change a man's temperament is more difficult."
(From "The Zen of Programming")  ;-)