Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!bu.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!ai-lab!rice-chex!bson
From: bson@rice-chex.ai.mit.edu (Jan Brittenson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.handhelds
Subject: Re: Chip 48 v2.25 question
Message-ID: <14658@life.ai.mit.edu>
Date: 4 Apr 91 22:38:31 GMT
References: <4741@gumby.Altos.COM> <1991Apr4.144736.5487@santra.uucp>
Sender: news@ai.mit.edu
Organization: nil
Lines: 35

In a posting of [4 Apr 91 14:47:36 GMT]
   gson@niksula.hut.fi (Andreas Gustafsson) writes:

 > For instance, the 8106 instruction (shift V1 right) is stored as the
 > bytes 81 and 06, where 81 is at the lower address.  This translates
 > into the nibbles 1 8 0 6, in increasing address order.

   I don't mean to nit-pick Andreas, but of course he meant 1 8 6 0.
(Just to avoid chaos & confusion.)

Oh, and while I'm typing away...

   I would like to get in touch with Paul Schlyter. But the address he
supplied me with - pausch@saaf.electra.se doesn't work.  Nor does any
of the following:

	saaf.electra.se!pausch@sunic.sunet.se
	@sunic.sunet.se: saaf.electra.se!pausch@kth.se

	saaf!pausch@sunic.sunet.se
	@sunic.sunet.se: saaf!pausch@kth.se

   There are also numerous other people who have sent me mail, but no
amount of work can produce a useful return path - not even recreating
a uucp bang path by deciphering the Received: data.  The problem is
that may of these messages have been replies to posts, and many news
readers aren't configured to supply any rational return address. And
the news path may differ from the mail path. If you have sent me mail,
but not received an answer, check your mail address. I eventually
reply to all mail I receive if it seems to me that the sender expects
a reply (and so does everyone else I know). Apologies for wasting net
bandwidth like this.

						-- Jan Brittenson
						   bson@ai.mit.edu