Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!apple!agate!web-1e.berkeley.edu!c60b-1eq From: c60b-1eq@web-1e.berkeley.edu (Noam Mendelson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Subject: Re: Difference between 386/33 & 486/25 not counting fp Message-ID: <1991Apr7.232112.20682@agate.berkeley.edu> Date: 7 Apr 91 23:21:12 GMT References: Sender: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (USENET Administrator) Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 13 In article dd2x+@andrew.cmu.edu (David Eugene Dwiggins) writes: >Is there a significant difference in speed between a cached 33 Mhz system >and a 486/25 system not counting floating point performance? >David Do you mean 33 MHz 386 vs. 25 MHz 486? If the 386 is cached, and you don't include the math coprocessor, it should be equal or faster than the 486. Of course that depends on the size of the cache. +==========================================================================+ | Noam Mendelson ..!agate!ucbvax!web!c60b-1eq | "I haven't lost my mind, | | c60b-1eq@web.Berkeley.EDU | it's backed up on tape | | University of California at Berkeley | somewhere." |