Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!caen!uwm.edu!linac!unixhub!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!elaine54.Stanford.EDU!fangchin From: fangchin@elaine54.Stanford.EDU (Chin Fang) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Subject: Re: NEC multisync Message-ID: <1991Apr9.004321.9783@leland.Stanford.EDU> Date: 9 Apr 91 00:43:21 GMT References: Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News) Organization: Stanford University, California, USA Lines: 28 In article et10+@andrew.cmu.edu (Edmund E. Tsai) writes: > >The original Multisync can handle the 800x600 graphics, but the only >problem is that the monitor has problem with v-hold > [a possible hardware fix was suggested] I think it also depends on the graphic driver's capability too. I am using a X11R4 X386 server on my 20Mhz non-caching 8 meg system with a SWAN ET4000 SVGA and a 3yrs old NEC Multisync II. I use 832x600 [256colors] All the time and the image is sitting square on where it should be. I don't even need to adjust the knobs. If I want to, I can make the resolution some- thing like 832x610 [256colors] With just a few editing of a driver configuration file. So I am not too sure whether the v-hold problem discussed in this thread is really a monitor or not. Chin Fang Mechanical Engineering Department Stanford University fangchin@leland.stanford.edu PS. I run AT&T SYSV/386 UNIX R3.2 on my box, if this matters