Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!ucbvax!agate!e260-3e.berkeley.edu!c60b-1eq From: c60b-1eq@e260-3e.berkeley.edu (Noam Mendelson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Subject: Re: Why buy a DX over an SX? Message-ID: <1991Apr9.235803.25607@agate.berkeley.edu> Date: 9 Apr 91 23:58:03 GMT References: <14534@encore.Encore.COM> Sender: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (USENET Administrator) Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 31 In article <14534@encore.Encore.COM> elliot@encore.com writes: >Ok, so we have beaten to death the differences between a 386SX and a 386DX. >What I would like to know is what to the big attraction of a DX which seems >to cost $200 more (without cache). What does the 32-bit interface buy you? >Certainly not CPU performance. I did some checking and got these SI (5.0) >numbers: >CPU SI (5.0) Comments >--- -------- -------- >286-16 12.3 My trusty 286 >386SX-20 12.8 A friend's system; claims that sometimes it is 15 >386DX-20 12.4 C&T, AMI, 2MB 80ns, interleaved, no wait states, no cache >386DX-25 15.5 Not the same system as above, but same coniguration First of all--don't post Norton SI results as serious statistics. Norton SI is a very vague measurement of overall system performance, not the CPU's performance. If you're interested, a 20 MHz Model 70 tests 21.5 on Norton 4.0 SI. >I was under the impression that DX boards (without cache) really scream. >I have heard claims of up to 24 SI, w/out cache. What am I missing? >Either 1) I've tested out cheap DX boards, or 2) I'm comparing SI 5.0 >to SI 4.5. Someone please set me straight before I shell out $$$ for a DX. That depends on what you use your system for. But if all you want is raw power, get a 386/25 or 386/33. I would also recommend an internal cache of 64K. +==========================================================================+ | Noam Mendelson ..!agate!ucbvax!web!c60b-1eq | "I haven't lost my mind, | | c60b-1eq@web.Berkeley.EDU | it's backed up on tape | | University of California at Berkeley | somewhere." |