Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!werner
From: werner@cs.utexas.edu (Werner Uhrig)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Re: RE: problems with SAM 2.0
Message-ID: <245@hedora.cs.utexas.edu>
Date: 9 Apr 91 20:00:13 GMT
References: <379.28005f7f@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Organization: Dept of Computer Sciences, UTexas, Austin
Lines: 26

In article <379.28005f7f@mbcl.rutgers.edu> friedman@mbcl.rutgers.edu writes:
>I Got off the phone with Symantec this morning.  They had us in their files,
>but  don't know why we didn't get the update cards.

	Assuming that they sent such a card... it might be an interesting test
	to drop a card into the mail, addressed to the address they used
	(to see IF that one reaches you - make sure to put a note on the card
	asking whoever gets the card to give you a call)

>BTW I checked with our PostMaster, and we don't seem to be getting Virus-L.

	rec.virus carries the VIRUS-L traffic (VIRUS-L is a BITnet list, which
	can be received as email also with the appropriate request (I think
	the request-address is LUKEN@LEHIIBM1.BITNET)

>Now all I have to do is talk my boss into upgrading to SAM 3.0 and
>this problem will be solved.

	I would still miss a public apology to Paul and Symantec for your
	"ranting" as well as a public "thank you" for the gracious offer of
	help you received from Paul by email ..
-- 

 (Internet)     werner@cs.utexas.edu
  (BITnet)      werner@UTXVM
   (UUCP)    ..!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!werner