Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!rex!ukma!dftsrv!mimsy!mojo!eng.umd.edu!tgoose
From: tgoose@eng.umd.edu (Jason Garms)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: Re: Imagewriter dead?
Message-ID: <1991Apr5.040420.23961@eng.umd.edu>
Date: 5 Apr 91 04:04:20 GMT
References: <1508@quintus.UUCP> <1991Mar29.202419.9939@zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu>
Sender: news@eng.umd.edu (C-News)
Reply-To: tgoose@eng.umd.edu (Jason Garms)
Organization: College of Engineering, Maryversity of Uniland, College Park
Lines: 12

In article <1991Mar29.202419.9939@zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu>, edgar@function.mps.ohio-state.edu (Gerald Edgar) writes:
> 
> Since the Stylewriter costs the same as the Imagewriter, does that mean
> that the Imagewriter is dead?
I hope not.  Imagewriters are still useful for a few things.
	1) They are color
	2) impact printers are a must for anyone who needs to
	    print on paper with carbons.


Jason Garms
tgoose@eng.umd.edu