Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!grad1.cis.upenn.edu!warden From: warden@grad1.cis.upenn.edu (Robert Warden) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware Subject: Cache Cards Message-ID: <40808@netnews.upenn.edu> Date: 10 Apr 91 00:23:41 GMT Sender: news@netnews.upenn.edu Reply-To: warden@grad1.cis.upenn.edu (Robert Warden) Distribution: na Organization: University of Pennsylvania Lines: 38 Nntp-Posting-Host: grad1.cis.upenn.edu Hi, I've been thinking of purchasing a cache card for my IIci and had some questions. 1. Does anyone out there have a cache card and do they think the performace increase is worth the price? 2. Which card is better - Apple's newly released card (64K I think) - DayStar's Fast Cache IIci (64K) - Technology Works IIci cache card (64K) I also remember reading somewhere about a 128K cache card - anyone remember the name? 3. I once heard that people had problems with crashes on some programs that didn't expect the cache to be there. Technically I think a cache should be transparent, but who knows what is actually done? 4. Is the "RAM cache" control in the Control Panel only for an added cache card, or does it refer to something else? 5. Is the IIci cache an instruction cache, a data cache, or both (unified). What type of performance increase are we talking about. I want to speed up my IIci, but I'm not really excited about buying an accelerator since I don't need that much speed. - Thanks!! ************************************************************************** ** Robert Warden warden@grad1.cis.upenn.edu ** ** University of Pennsylvania ** ** ** ** "Even a broken clock tells the time correctly twice a day" ** ** - Withnail & I ** **************************************************************************