Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!bionet!agate!ziploc!eps
From: eps@toaster.SFSU.EDU (Eric P. Scott)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: Why did 2.0 munge telnet?
Message-ID: <1465@toaster.SFSU.EDU>
Date: 5 Apr 91 03:48:42 GMT
Article-I.D.: toaster.1465
References: <1991Apr03.025943.14365@ecst.csuchico.edu> <1991Apr4.011125.23142@csus.edu>
Reply-To: eps@cs.SFSU.EDU (Eric P. Scott)
Organization: San Francisco State University
Lines: 10

There have been two releases of the telnet software since the
4.3-reno versions that NeXT used.  If I come up with something
that works better than what NeXT distributed with 2.0, I'll post
to comp.sys.next.

stty -extproc   explicitly disables LINEMODE telnet--this is
something one normally doesn't want to do (assuming that the
software is working correctly).

					-=EPS=-