Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!sun!amdcad!jetsun!pyramid!infmx!bhughes
From: bhughes@informix.com (Blake Hughes)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: Improv does not cater to the scientific!
Message-ID: <1991Apr5.011403.19176@informix.com>
Date: 5 Apr 91 01:14:03 GMT
References: <1991Mar30.032849.2659@agate.berkeley.edu> <1991Mar30.053149.14485@neon.Stanford.EDU> <70370@brunix.UUCP>
Sender: news@informix.com (Usenet News)
Organization: Informix Software, Inc.
Lines: 16

In article <70370@brunix.UUCP> rca@cs.brown.edu (Ronald C.F. Antony) writes:
>In article <1991Mar30.053149.14485@neon.Stanford.EDU> zimmer@calvin.stanford.edu (Andrew Zimmerman) writes:
>>3.  Figuring that Improv was a lost cause, I gave the people at WingZ a call.
>>    Turns out that WingZ only runs under 1.0, and even then, they are having
>>    trouble shipping.  (Some lame excuse about not being able to get OD's)
>WingZ runs as perfectly as ever (what ever that means) on the NeXT
>even under 2.0. I'm doing this right now, so if Informix can tell me
>why they think it does not work under 2.0, I'd be interested...
...
>Ronald

Wingz works for me under 2.0 also, but as of a few weeks ago, it has
not been through the QA cycle.  Once QA has put it through the
ringers and they don't discover anything major, then Informix
can stamp it as compatible.
Blake