Xref: utzoo comp.lang.fortran:5105 comp.unix.cray:292 comp.sys.super:311
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!convex.csd.uwm.edu!bruno
From: bruno@convex.csd.uwm.edu (Bruno Wolff III)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran,comp.unix.cray,comp.sys.super
Subject: Re: Fortran optimization
Message-ID: <10776@uwm.edu>
Date: 4 Apr 91 21:39:21 GMT
References: <1991Apr3.062644.23436@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov>
Sender: news@uwm.edu
Followup-To: comp.lang.fortran
Organization: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Computing Services Division
Lines: 5

One other thing. If this was a real problem, you probably would not want to
use 10000 as the first subscript limit of your arrays. 10000 is divisible by 16,
so you are near the breakpoint for bank conflicts when making consecutive
references on the second subscript. You might try making the subscript limit
10001 and see if you get any speed up.