Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!apple!motcsd!mcdcup!mcdchg!mcdphx!varese.UUCP!kjj
From: kjj@varese.UUCP (Kevin Johnson)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.admin
Subject: Re: sendmail shock.  Bibliography?
Message-ID: <14800@mcdphx.phx.mcd.mot.com>
Date: 5 Apr 91 15:35:55 GMT
References: <1991Apr1.173622.12281@appmag.com> <1991Apr2.180215.1356@sci34hub.sci.com> <BARNETT.91Apr3153827@grymoire.crd.ge.com> <uf3Gv1qg1@cs.psu.edu>
Sender: listen@mcdphx.phx.mcd.mot.com
Reply-To: kjj@varese.UUCP (Kevin Johnson)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Motorola Microcomputer Division, Tempe, Az.
Lines: 19

In article <uf3Gv1qg1@cs.psu.edu> schwartz@groucho.cs.psu.edu (Scott Schwartz) writes:
>
>barnett@grymoire.crd.ge.com (Bruce Barnett) writes:
>   gary@sci34hub.sci.com (Gary Heston) writes:
>   Or you can get Ease 3.1 - which is a higher level language for
>   sendmail files. Ease does not replace sendmail. 
>Sendmail is ++ungood.
>
>My experience has been that Ease is not much better than sendmail,
>especially considering that the alternatives are so much better.

In what way is Ease 'not much better then sendmail'?

#include <standard_disclaimer>
'"Arf", she said.'
	- Mr. Frank Zappa
.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.
| Kevin Johnson                     kjj@phx.mcd.mot.com | ...!mcdphx!QIS1!kjj |
| QIS System Administrator  Motorola MCG                                      |