Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!hsdndev!husc6!purdue!yeh
From: yeh@cs.purdue.EDU (Wei Jen Yeh)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: SVR4.0
Summary: works well for Dell's
Message-ID: <14246@medusa.cs.purdue.edu>
Date: 9 Apr 91 20:40:22 GMT
References: <9104051959.AA23768@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <1991Apr6.184400.47303@cc.usu.edu>
Sender: news@cs.purdue.EDU
Organization: Department of Computer Science, Purdue University
Lines: 21

In article <1991Apr6.184400.47303@cc.usu.edu>, jrd@cc.usu.edu writes:
> In article <9104051959.AA23768@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>, DA462CS@OPIE.BGSU.EDU writes:
> > 
> > price, this is my choice right now.  Is there any benefit in going with
> > the other guys: Interactive, SCO, ESIX, UHC????  Price is not a concern 
> ... For
> example, most AMI Bios machines I've checked will not boot AT&T's SVR4,
> but a Phoenix Bios is just fine.
> 	Joe D. (I have an AT&T SVR4 systems a'building)

  Dell's sVr4.0.2 runs without problems on my 386-20 with AMI bios.

Wei Jen Yeh                      yeh@cs.purdue.edu
                                 Department of Computer Science
                                 Purdue University
                                 West Lafayette, Indiana
-- 
Wei Jen Yeh                      yeh@cs.purdue.edu
                                 Department of Computer Science
                                 Purdue University
                                 West Lafayette, Indiana