Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!pa.dec.com!jrdzzz.jrd.dec.com!tkou02.enet.dec.com!jit345!diamond
From: diamond@jit345.swstokyo.dec.com (Norman Diamond)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: Those Reader's Comments cards (was Re: vmstat's -v option)
Message-ID: <1991Apr8.020131.2300@tkou02.enet.dec.com>
Date: 8 Apr 91 02:01:31 GMT
References: <1991Apr3.181543.7170@netcom.COM> <2859@shodha.enet.dec.com> <1991Apr5.173503.16397@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu>
Sender: usenet@tkou02.enet.dec.com (USENET News System)
Reply-To: diamond@jit345.enet@tkou02.enet.dec.com (Norman Diamond)
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation Japan , Tokyo
Lines: 21

In article <1991Apr5.173503.16397@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> cks@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu (Chris Siebenmann) writes:
>Ye Random Person @ DEC writes:
>| 	Please send in an appropriately filled in Reader's Comments
>| 	page from the back of the section.
> Ah yes, the wonderfull boasted-about (certainly is in the 'Read Before
>Installing' thing I just got with RISC Fortran 2.0: "Digital prides
>itself" etc) Reader's Comments form, so lovingly preaddressed and
>postage-paid ... in the US.
> Try again, Digital. 
>[Moral: Small things count.]

How could you afford the phone bill to make that posting?

If you're really desperate, maybe the company could be persuaded to
increase the price of each product by a couple of hundred yen and
attach postage stamps to the Reader's Comments forms at the back of
the manuals before shipping the products.  But I doubt it.
(Personal opinion only.)
--
Norman Diamond       diamond@tkov50.enet.dec.com
If this were the company's opinion, I wouldn't be allowed to post it.