Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!apple!fernwood!uupsi!sunic!news.funet.fi!hydra!cc.helsinki.fi!tmottonen
From: tmottonen@cc.helsinki.fi
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: new windows OS
Message-ID: <1991Apr6.233850.5871@cc.helsinki.fi>
Date: 6 Apr 91 23:38:50 GMT
References: <1991Apr5.215151.5455@hubcap.clemson.edu>
Organization: University of Helsinki
Lines: 15

In article <1991Apr5.215151.5455@hubcap.clemson.edu>, cballen@hubcap.clemson.edu (charles allen) writes:
> Why not?  Why not replace DOS with a full operating system for WINDOWS
> that can still run DOS apps from a shell?
> 
> Yes, what I'm talking about sounds like OS2, but I want it for ALL 
> machines, not just microchannel.  Plus, it better not be as buggy.

    One correction: OS/2 is not only for MicroChannel machines.

    Teemu.
-- 
                             _________
	Teemu Mottonen	    |         |	internet: tmottonen@cc.helsinki.Fi
    University of Helsinki  |         |   bitnet: TMOTTONEN@FINUH
   Dept.of Computer Science |_________|	  decnet: HYLK::TMOTTONEN