Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!emory!dixie.com!eeh
From: eeh@Dixie.Com (Ed Howland)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: new windows OS
Message-ID: <9383@rsiatl.Dixie.Com>
Date: 8 Apr 91 23:40:36 GMT
References: <1991Apr5.215151.5455@hubcap.clemson.edu> <1991Apr6.233850.5871@cc.helsinki.fi>
Organization: Dixie Communications Services
Lines: 19

tmottonen@cc.helsinki.fi writes:

In article <1991Apr5.215151.5455@hubcap.clemson.edu>, cballen@hubcap.clemson.edu (charles allen) writes:
> Why not?  Why not replace DOS with a full operating system for WINDOWS
> that can still run DOS apps from a shell?
> 
> Yes, what I'm talking about sounds like OS2, but I want it for ALL 
> machines, not just microchannel.  Plus, it better not be as buggy.


	I have heard a rumor that DOS 6.0 is supposed to be just that. But
who knows? Its a decent idea.

Ed.

-- 
Ed Howland   Internet:   eeh@dixie.com   uucp: ...{uunet,emory}!rsiatl!eeh
"I am expressly forbidden to offer any kind of warranty. This covers ideas,
 thoughts, opinions, or just plain gibberish. They are only offered 'As is'."