Xref: utzoo comp.windows.open-look:1140 comp.lang.postscript:8227 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!mcnc!gatech!prism!ne201ph From: ne201ph@prism.gatech.EDU (Halvorson,Peter J) Newsgroups: comp.windows.open-look,comp.lang.postscript Subject: Re: Update on SPARCprinter/NeWSprint resolution problem Message-ID: <25756@hydra.gatech.EDU> Date: 7 Apr 91 20:15:35 GMT References: <41@ftms.UUCP> <1991Apr7.020109.11882@rodan.acs.syr.edu> Followup-To: comp.windows.open-look Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology Lines: 28 In article <1991Apr7.020109.11882@rodan.acs.syr.edu> amichiel@rodan.acs.syr.edu (Allen J Michielsen) writes: > > I disagree on both points. The more postscript code is 'handled' the more >problems there will always be with it. There are several risc postscript >processing cards for different print engines (most noteably is the HP's). >The increase in performance is intense. > >-- >Al. Michielsen, Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Syracuse University Check out the prices on these risc card equiped postscript printers. The educational price on the SPARCprinter ( equal to other companies list prices) is $1700. This is for a 12 ppm ( real throughput), 400 dpi printer. I'm sure that the cards you mention must add up to more than $5000 for a similar printer. The software is buggy, as is almost any first release. Sun is already doing News ( screen postscript), so it must have seemed like a small job to extend it to dumping rasters to a printer. Peter Halvorson -- Nuclear Engineering Program Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332 uucp: ...!{allegra,amd,hplabs,ut-ngp}!gatech!prism!ne201ph Internet: ne201ph@prism.gatech.edu -- peter@fission.gatech.edu -- Peter Halvorson -- Nuclear Engineering Program Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332 uucp: ...!{allegra,amd,hplabs,ut-ngp}!gatech!prism!ne201ph Internet: ne201ph@prism.gatech.edu -- peter@fission.gatech.edu