Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!crackers!m2c!seqp4!ajm
From: ajm@seqp4.ORG (A.J.Madison)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: X Test Suite?
Summary: tests, tests, tests
Message-ID: <710@seqp4.UUCP>
Date: 5 Apr 91 21:22:31 GMT
References: <1991Apr3.183121.20313@SanDiego.NCR.COM>
Distribution: na
Organization: Sequoia Systems Inc., Marlboro, Mass.
Lines: 27

In article <1991Apr3.183121.20313@SanDiego.NCR.COM>, manny@tortuga.SanDiego.NCR.COM (Manny (Emmanuel) Bagnas) writes:
> Here's a stupid question:  What sort of certification or validation
> tests are available for X11R4?  I've seen a test suite on expo but
> it's in an alpha state.
> 
> I'd also be interested in hearing from individuals who have provided X
> as a commercial product.  Did you do any sort of validation or was
> it just, "Well, it runs... Let's ship it."
> 
> adthanksvance
> 
> manny.bagnas@sandiego.ncr.com

I also would be interested in hearing about X testing experiences.  Also, I
am interested in anyone's experiences with the motif 1.0 test suite.  It
would appear that I am seeing a large number of variances from the 
documentation and wonder what is actually wrong.  Finally, I have the same
last interest, but for Motif, though perhaps the qualification criteria might
be a little tighter, like, "Well, the whole department doesn't seem to be
complaining about it... Let's ship it."

--aj madison ajm@sequoia.com  (maybe i'll get it, OR)
-- 
when everyone is out to get you, being paranoid is just good thinking.
         - Dr. Johnny Fever <in other words, standard disclaimer>
A.J. Madison                               ajm@seqp4@m2c.m2c.org@uunet
Sequoia Systems Inc.                   seqp4!ajm@endor@das.harvard.edu