Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!lll-winken!sun-barr!newstop!sun!amdcad!amdcad!military From: tek@CS.UCLA.EDU (Ted Kim) Newsgroups: sci.military Subject: Re: Pods on the tail of USSR SSN Message-ID: <1991Apr4.042828.13611@amd.com> Date: 3 Apr 91 17:28:56 GMT References: <1991Apr3.024755.24304@amd.com> Sender: military@amd.com Organization: UCLA Lines: 34 Approved: military@amd.com From: tek@CS.UCLA.EDU (Ted Kim) arthur@Eng.Sun.COM (Arthur Leung) writes: > If this is the pod at the top of the fin seen on the stern of > surfaced Soviet submarines, I believe the volume is too small to > house your average towed array. A towed array sonar is pretty large > in diameter. It won't get much of a length in that small space. The > towed array housing on Los Angeles class boats looks to be about 1' > tube running a good portion of the length of the boat. Might this > Soviet pod be used as a housing and reel for VLF antenna? It would > fit better. In the "Soviet Navy" column of April 1991 USNI Proceedings, Norman Polomar and LtCmdr Jurrien Noot (Royal Netherlands Navy) mention the tear-drop shaped pod on the Victor III (which is about 29.5 feet long and almost 8 feet at its widest point). Their opinion is that it is most likely a housing for a THIN-LINE towed array sonar. They mention a variety of alternative possibilities: towed communications cable, torpedo decoy system, auxiliary high-speed burst propulsion, auxiliary low-speed creep propulsion. They believe any theories about MHD or EMT auxiliary propulsion systems are not likely because of the high power consumption necessary and because there is no opening on the front of the pod for water intake. Also, they note the high position makes it vulnerable to ice damage. -- Ted Kim Internet: tek@penzance.cs.ucla.edu UCLA Computer Science Department UUCP: ...!{uunet|ucbvax}!cs.ucla.edu!tek 3804C Boelter Hall Phone: (213)206-8696 Los Angeles, CA 90024 FAX: (213)825-2273