Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!aero-c!nadel
From: gazit@cs.duke.edu (Hillel Gazit)
Newsgroups: soc.feminism
Subject: Re: The problem in academia
Message-ID: <670881345@lear.cs.duke.edu>
Date: 5 Apr 91 19:55:46 GMT
References: 8589@cs.utexas.edu> <1991Mar28.154345.12953@psych.toronto.edu>
Sender: news@aero.org
Organization: Nefolet shel nemushot (Fallout of Wimps)
Lines: 28
Approved: nadel@aerospace.aero.org
Status: R
Originator: nadel@aerospace.aero.org


In article <1991Mar28.154345.12953@psych.toronto.edu> 
chris@psych.toronto.edu (Christine Hitchcock) writes:

>And this is a direct threat to them. It is not surprising that men are
>threatened by the prospect of women being hired fairly on their merits.  

First you (feminists) demand that every candidate to job/university
education will write his race/sex in affirmative action forms,
and that *women* will get a priority because of their sex.

It went on for 20 years, and now you ask for (at least) 20 more years.

Now you tell me that you want to be hired on your "merits"...

Well Christine, will you give up your AA advantage 
(or the Canadian equivalent)?

If you are so sure in the quality of your merits then why are
you so sure that you need affirmative action?

Take a look in my .signature and learn how other people 
advance by their real "merits", no by their sex.

>Chris Hitchcock, Dept. of Psychology     chris@psych.toronto.edu

Hillel                                  gazit@cs.duke.edu

"...13 of 17 valedictorians in Boston high schools last spring were immigrants
or children of immigrants." --  US. News & World Report, May 14, 1990