Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!ox.com!ox.com!emv From: emv@ox.com (Ed Vielmetti) Subject: Re: WAN Bridge/Router over Fractional T1 (64K) In-Reply-To: vjs@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com's message of 7 Apr 91 20:13:56 GMT Message-ID: Sender: usenet@ox.com (Usenet News Administrator) Organization: OTA Limited Partnership, Ann Arbor MI. References: <1991Mar27.152925.8267@exloghou.portal.com> <11659@cpoint.clearpoint.com> <95891@sgi.sgi.com> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1991 23:03:27 GMT In article <95891@sgi.sgi.com> vjs@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com (Vernon Schryver) writes: Was I wrong in finding the Clearpoint article past the edge of non-commericalism? Yes. The Clearpoint article was informative, and provided an appropriate amount of detail to the reader to determine whether the product was interesting or not. It would not have been an appropriate article in comp.sys.sgi, but in comp.dcom.lans it was quite reasonable. In particular it let me determine what the Clearpoint product was not going to be interesting in the short to medium term because it did not support the point to point protocol (ppp), and that is a primary requirement for routers/bridges that I am now evaluating. Would it be wrong to ask that such lead chasing be conducted by email, with summaries to the net by the original requester? It was not clear that this was lead chasing, any more that it would be lead chasing for you to mention that SGI boxes do real fast FDDI in a group that sometimes discussed FDDI. If this were a mailing list with a set policy of encouraging summaires to the list (e.g. sun-managers), then the posting would have been inappropriate; but this is comp.dcom.lans, and in this group there's plenty of discussion. Would it be too much to ask that such product announcements be concise enough to fit on a single 80-line screen? Product announcements are traditionally confined to comp.newprod, though some vendors do have their own newsgroups (e.g. comp.dcom.lans.cisco) on which new products are mentioned. I'm quite sure that SGI products are discussed by SGI people on comp.sys.sgi. -- Msen Edward Vielmetti /|--- moderator, comp.archives emv@msen.com "With all of the attention and publicity focused on gigabit networks, not much notice has been given to small and largely unfunded research efforts which are studying innovative approaches for dealing with technical issues within the constraints of economic science." RFC 1216