Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!sjsca4!poffen
From: poffen@sj.ate.slb.com (Russ Poffenberger)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Slip over T1000's
Message-ID: <1991Apr10.195722.3339@sj.ate.slb.com>
Date: 10 Apr 91 19:57:22 GMT
References: <155@blekko.UUCP> <1991Apr07.144948.956@nstar.rn.com>
Reply-To: poffen@SunOS (Russ Poffenberger)
Organization: Schlumberger Technologies, ATE division, San Jose, Ca.
Lines: 23

In article <1991Apr07.144948.956@nstar.rn.com> larry@nstar.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
>skrenta@blekko.UUCP (Rich Skrenta) writes:
>
>>We're experimenting with SLIP over Telebit T1000's and we're getting
>>pretty choppy response.  An rlogin over a direct connect slip line
>>seems faster than over the Telebit.  Are there any registers that
>>can be tweaked to improve slip performance?
>
>>Does V.32 do a better job with slip?  How much does slip spoofing in
>>the T2500 help?
>
>yes - the PEP modems (T2000 and PLUS) at best give around 400 cps
>using SLIP while V.32 should run around 1100
>

I run SLIP (not the compressed SLIP) between a pair of T1000's all the time
and I can get >700 bytes/sec throughput. This is locking the DTE's at 19200.
This is about what I would expect from a 9600 baud modem.

Russ Poffenberger               DOMAIN: poffen@sj.ate.slb.com
Schlumberger Technologies       UUCP:   {uunet,decwrl,amdahl}!sjsca4!poffen
1601 Technology Drive		CIS:	72401,276
San Jose, Ca. 95110             (408)437-5254