Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Path: utzoo!utgpu!cunews!nrcnet0!VM.NRC.CA!RRH
From: RRH@VM.NRC.CA
Subject: Multiple Interface Addresses
Message-ID: <1991Apr12.121846.20016@nrcnet0.nrc.ca>
Sender: root@nrcnet0.nrc.ca (Operator)
Nntp-Posting-Host: vm.nrc.ca
Organization: National Research Council
Date: 12 Apr 1991 08:15:17 EDT

J. Bashinski  mentions a technique for having multiple addresses on  one
port by using secondary options. i.e

    interface ethernet 0
    ip address 131.108.1.1  255.255.255.0
    ip address 131.108.2.1  255.255.255.0  secondary
    ip address 131.108.3.1  255.255.255.0  secondary

We have been using the following technique (cause at time there was no
secondary option).

    ip route 131.108.2.1 ethernet 0
    ip route 131.108.3.1 ethernet 0

It does the job  but which technique is better ?

Ratilal Haria